Probably the coolest VIm plugin since netrw, welcome CSApprox! Just put this in your .vim/plugin and away you go with completely transparent and automatic 256 color themes for your terminal vim that look amazingly not unlike the GUI versions of those themes. Just make sure your terminal properly reports 256 colors, and that your vim binary is compiled with gui support (debian flavors do this, but apparently not red hat flavors). If either of these are missing it will give you a little message and delay opening vim, if this is a problem you might want to suppress that output.
I also highly recommend enabling 256 colors via Xresources rather than setting
TERM=xterm-256color, this will save headache when sshing in from a less fine terminal or when logging in at the console. A quick google turns up plenty of info on how o set your Xresources with one caveat; if you use uxterm like any sane person would, you need
s/Xterm/UXterm/. I’ve also found cases where I need
xterm as well, so I simply put all three in there to be safe.
Xterm*termName: xterm-256color
UXterm*termName: xterm-256color
xterm*termName: xterm-256color
Some time ago, being the no good visual designer I am, I decided to put together a mutt color theme. This was no ordinary theme, I’m talking 256 colors! No, don’t worry, the theme doesn’t use all 256 colors.
Aaron’s post prompted me to put up my theme for consumption, enjoyment, and comment. If you want details on how to make the colors work, follow the link above, he did a good job of that already.
Now, the theme and screenshots.
In a refreshing break from political posts, I’m going to rejoice in the bounty that is white-space airwaves made free and open. With all TV broadcast going digital, there will be many chunks of EM spectrum between digital TV channels. This is known as white-space, or unused digital TV spectrum. The FCC voted 5-0 to make these unused frequencies available in the same sense CB, 802.11 and walkie talkie frequencies are. What does this mean? Why the big fuss? Well, not only does it mean more frequencies available for wireless internet and other uses, it also means longer range for wireless internet and other things. These are the same frequencies that TV signals are broadcast long distances on, remember. It is very exciting. Some call it wifi on steroids. Along those lines, think Digis (or insert wireless provider here) on steroids. Room for more wireless ISPs and at greater range, therefore less base stations, more customers, more competition, and lower costs all around! But it’s not just about wireless providers, or even just internet, my brother wants to build a GPS receiver that transmits the raw data home for actual position calculation, offloading the hard work, making the mobile unit simpler and cheaper. The newly available spectrum means for him more range and less interference. Exciting times!
Please, Von, please, next time you set up a samba mount, just use cifs and not smbfs. Save yourself a lot of headache.
I’ve been maintaining a google calendar of the BYU academic schedule for the past year or so. It just occurred to me to let people know about it, though it has been “public” the whole time.
There’s the official gcal button, and here’s the ical and the html. Before this one I was using someone elses. Worked great until he graduated and stopped maintaining it. So if anyone would like “write access” to this calendar as well, just drop me a line. Hopefully we can keep it alive for generations to come.
Actually, I hope BYU will publish an ical version or something else parseable by gcal itself someday. Just keep hoping.
In a world frought with restrictive employment agreements how is a prospective employee to protect himself? I believe the reason there are so many undesirable terms is because job seekers are too eager for that next big break or that shiny big company they can put on their resumé. If the companies couldn’t get any bites on these contracts then they would stop mandating them. It’s up to us as the fresh meat on the market to take a stand and decline oppressive agreements. Patience is key. There are plenty of jobs out there and with enough searching and patience I believe you can find a mode of employ that’s not only unrestrictive but that’s mutually beneficial. Seek out that employer you can build a symbiotic relationship with. Work with someone whose goals and values you can make your own. You will be much happier. As such you will be more productive and make your employer happier as well. Dare to love your job, not just what you do, but how you do it and under what terms as well.
The economics of software and all things digital are fiercely different from standard physical economics. The new economy is radically different because of the radically different nature of the commodities. In the physical economy even the most abundant commodities can only be sold once by a particular entity. If I have a truckload of dirt and sell it to a landfill, my dirt is gone. If I have a software product I can sell it time and time again and still have the product. This sounds great, right? What a wonderful and magical thing I have! There’s a problem. Before when I sold my dirt it was gone. I had to get more dirt to sell to someone else. The buyer of my first load could sell it to my next customer and undermine my market, but I’m not worried about that because that consumer ‘consumes’ the dirt and can no longer reuse it. However, when I sell my software the customer can use, reuse, and even redistribute the software indefinately. We have producers but nothing is consumed! This notion of consumers is so fundemental to the physical economy it’s no wonder the ramifications have continued to baffle business. Instead of trying to understand the fundemental differences, business has tried with only limited success to apply artificial barriers and rules to make the new system behave like the old. The fathers of Free software and OSS understood these differences early on and see the artificial modifications as a gross perversion of a wonderful new thing. There’s only one missing piece to this new economy. In an economy, work is performed, things traded, and both yourself and society are benefited. Again imagine I have dirt, this time it’s magical digital dirt. Once I have the dirt everyone potentially has the dirt also. I cannot sell the dirt, everyone has it! Some have tried making new dirt to turn a profit. So I make some green dirt in hopes of making some money from it. But again, I can’t sell the dirt because once I make it, everyone has it already! Society advances but leaves me behind. If I am to help myself in this brave new world I must abandon the idea that the dirt has any value in and of itself. If I make new dirt it’s because I need it, not because it can be sold. Some companies partially embrace the idea and take red dirt and blue dirt made by others and combine it to make purple dirt. But the same fallacy holds, they cannot sell the dirt! The only thing to do is to use the dirt. Let’s shift gears now and imagine paint is free and there’s an unlimited supply. To sell the paint would be silly, but professional painters can still make money putting logos on buildings and signs, applying the paint to roadways and fences. Say I’m a painter and a customer wants her fence to glow in the dark. There is no glow in the dark paint. I can develop the paint myself or I can pay a developer to get me the paint. The only catch is I must abandon all sense of ownership of the new glowing paint, as must the developer if I hired one. Whether I’m the developer or the painter (or both) I put in the effort to make glow in the dark paint to please my customers, not to have the paint. This is the fundemental ideal that must be applied to this magical world of 1’s and 0’s in order to have lasting success. You must use, modify, and create software for the sole purpose of pleasing your customers. If you try to make and sell one product you will be left behind in the blink of an eye.
In this time of increasing digital communication, more and more aspects of our life become targets for digital theft. The problem is exacerbated where the magnificent increases in computing power make it harder still to be secure. The door to our digital home is growing larger and more porous with every advancement in technology and convenience. I am beginning to steer my career towards these security issues. I aim to become a systems security consultant or something of the like. As such I would like to begin by consulting you.
Very smart people are creating some amazing encryption technologies. These are further scrutinized and improved by countless more smart people. Have we realized absolute security? Only time will tell, but enough experts suggest that only sheer computing power stands between these encryptions and their content. If this is the case, the raging growth of computing power will soon rush over our walls. Thus security is not solvable problem, but an ongoing battle.
If a good encryption was all it took then we’d be pretty well off, at least for the present computing environment. Unfortunately, security is not a lock, it’s more like a lock and chain. In most cases it’s a reasonably strong lock on a pathetic chain. If the chain is broken the lock does no good. The weakest link in this proverbial chain is by far the human link. There have been clever ways to reduce this link. One example is the advent of the public/private key encryption. No longer does a single key have to be shared between two parties. Once we had a weak link in the messenger of the key; now it’s no link at all.
However there are still many links of human nature with a high potential for weakness. All to often this potential is fully realized. Such links are passphrases or the safe keeping of the keys. There is hope, though. Just because the human link tends to be disproportionately weak doesn’t mean it has to be. Some general rules for strengthening our security include strong passwords. This doesn’t mean something unpronounceable (let alone memorable). It does mean something that’s not in a dictionary. I like to take words from different languages and phonetically smash them together. Something I like. Something I can subvocalize and remember. Another strength strategy is to increase the number of doors to break through. This is done by varying your passwords. If you have one password for all things all it takes is one password leak, perhaps from your favorite fad web site, and your entire security system comes crashing down. If a different password for every application is too much to remember, perhaps try classes of passwords. Use one password for trivial things, one for run of the mill accounts, and one or many for the real sensitive things, for example. Lastly, never divulge sensitive information over insecure channels, ever!
There are so many more ways the human link can be exploited. The best practice is education. If you’re worried about security you should be constantly educating yourself, finding and strengthening your weakest links. This is especially true if your worried about someone else’s security (your employers, for example). If you are an employer then hire someone who is well educating in the pitfalls and solutions of security, and one who will remain thus educated. If you’re just Joe User, only marginally worried about it, you should at the very least follow the guidelines listed above.
As stated before, security is an ongoing battle, both for the cypher writers and for the humans that use it. It’s a race between technology and technology, between the sly and the savvy. If you just learn something every month and apply it you’ll be far ahead of the masses. Stay on top of the game, even if it’s just through baby steps.
IMMS was complaining to me that sox couldn’t read mp3 files to alalyze them. I wasn’t about to let this go on too long, I want IMMS to work to it’s full potential. I tried installing liblame0 and liblame-dev, I even tried libmad but all to no avail. Finally I did apt-cache policy sox. The installed version was some studio version from DeMuDi. I thought if any of the available packages would support mp3 it would be the one from demudi, alas this was not the case. I installed the version from ftp.easynet.fr (PLF) and now I have (readonly) support for mp3. Good enough for me.
I once again have a working IMMS system. (Finally!) I’m using MPD for the player, my own imms.rb to talk to IMMS, and a history/queue wrapper client to turn MPD’s playlist into—you guessed it—a history (before current song) and queue (after current song).
This has the downside that your playlist isn’t a comprehensive playlist. So if you use a client where you would select a song you wanted to hear from a playlist you might not find it. Not to mention that would also mess up the IMMS behaviour.
My solution is mpremote.rb (which also needs livesearch.rb) to quickly find songs from the library and enqueue (enter) or jump-to (END) any song or group of songs I feel like listening to.
Eventually I’ll make a qt or gtk version of mpremote to be more like xmmsfind_remote (if you still use xmms I highly recommend it). Hans and I are also currently conspiring to make an even better MPD that will queue and possibly talk to imms itself.
